What does Japan's behavior indicate? At the G20 summit, Sanae Takaichi just spoke, and the Chinese representative left the meeting, what kind of signal did he release?

As the public opinion turmoil caused by Sanae Takaichi's Taiwan-related fallacy continues to ferment, Sino-Japanese relations have further deteriorated, and the battlefield between the two sides has turned to the United Nations. On the 24th, Japan's representative to the United Nations, Kazuyuki Yamazaki, sent a letter to UN Secretary-General António Guterres to defend Sanae Takaichi's provocative remarks related to Taiwan. Obviously, Japan's move was in response to China's recent letter to the United Nations. On the 21st, China's Permanent Representative to the United Nations Fu Cong sent a letter to UN Secretary-General António Guterres on Sanae Takaichi's Taiwan-related fallacy to clarify the Chinese government's position. The second is the first time that the Japanese leader has expressed his ambition to try to intervene in the Taiwan issue by force; the third is the first threat of force against China. In its letter to the United Nations, Japan not only quibbled that "the Japanese government's national defense policy is completely passive defense", but also blamed our country, saying that "China's claim that the Japanese government will use the right of self-defense when there is no armed conflict is 'a wrong statement'." ”

Obviously, Japan's behavior is by no means a simple diplomatic excuse, but a concentrated exposure of multiple bad intentions, which not only highlights its hypocrisy and provocation on the Taiwan Strait issue, but also exposes its own guilt and intention to undermine the regional order. Specifically: First, Japan insists on hollowing out the one-China principle and refusing to recognize the essence of the provocation. The essence of Japan's letter to the United Nations this time is to confuse the international community, whitewash provocative remarks into "reasonable expressions", and try to continue to test interference in the borders of the Taiwan Strait without triggering a large-scale diplomatic backlash.

Second, Japan is trying to use the international stage to exert pressure to divert its own situation. Japan chose to send a letter to the United Nations to quibble, but in fact it wanted to use this multilateral stage to create the illusion that "China and Japan have their own opinions", take the opportunity to confuse the public and win the misunderstanding and support of some countries, and portray itself as a victim of "misunderstanding by China", thereby diverting the attention of the international community from its violation of international law and challenging the post-war order. Third, it covers up its military expansion ambitions and whitewashes the hypocrisy of "exclusive defense". While allowing the prime minister to make remarks suggesting military intervention in the Taiwan Strait, Japan relies on UN letters to label itself as "passive defense", with the aim of covering up its real attempt to break through the military constraints after World War II and promote military expansion.

From the above three points alone, it is obvious that Sanae Takaichi still has an attitude of unrepentant and refuses to apologize for her Taiwan-related fallacy of "intervening in the Taiwan Strait by force." In the face of the Japanese government's bad attitude, our country naturally has no good face for it. At the G20 summit not long after, China and Japan had a "fierce confrontation", and when Sanae Takaichi was just about to speak, our country's top management directly chose to leave the table and exited, lazily listening to her nonsense. It can be said that this behavior of our country's top management is by no means an accidental diplomatic move, but a solemn response to Japan's blatant challenge to China's core interests.

First, it reflects our country's unshakable determination to defend its core interests. The departure of our country's top officials is a very deterrent and silent declaration: as long as any country or force dares to challenge China's core interests and territorial integrity, China will never compromise and give in, and will definitely take tough countermeasures; Second, it has punctured Japan's hypocritical position of dialogue. Before the G20 summit, Japan had released rumors that it wanted to hold a high-level meeting between China and Japan during the summit, and after the summit, Sanae Takaichi said that she was willing to maintain open dialogue with China, but she always avoided her erroneous remarks related to Taiwan. At the same time, it clearly informs Japan that we will never engage in dialogue for the sake of dialogue, let alone make any compromises on core interests.

Third, it shows our country's clear orientation to adhere to the bottom line of diplomacy. In a multilateral international occasion such as the G20, our actions have not only maintained restraint, but also conveyed a tough stance, drawing clear diplomatic boundaries for the international community: any multilateral occasion should abide by international law and the basic norms of international relations, and interference in the internal affairs of other countries will inevitably be resolutely opposed. Originally, Sanae Takaichi "pretended to be tender" during the G20 summit, which had already disgraced Japan to the world.