Gemini 3.0

This guide provides a comprehensive introduction to using Gemini 3.0, covering recommended Gemini 3.0 websites available domestically and detailed usage tutorials to help you quickly understand Gemini.

yyai8.com

Gemini 3.0 Domestic Version Entry: yyai8.com

Google AI Studio

Google AI Studio is a free platform for individuals and small teams, allowing for quick experience and testing. (Requires a tool)

Gemini's official website can be used directly. (Requires a tool)

Although GPT-5.1 remains powerful in certain capabilities (such as daily programming, quick responses), users subjectively feel that the user experience of Gemini 3.0 (and the Gemini series) is better, mainly attributed to the following core dimensions:

1. Overwhelming "authenticity" in aesthetic and sensory experience (visual and entertainment)

First, let's compare the multimodal generation capabilities: Gemini brings users far greater surprises than GPT:

Remove "AI-like": GPT-generated images and videos are described as "fake," "stiff," and having a strong "AI-like" quality. In contrast, Gemini's images have "film-like colors," rich character expressions, high fidelity, beautiful video quality, and even meet the aesthetic standards that can be directly used as base shots.

Rich Interactivity: When creating small games, Gemini can implement mouse control, making the visuals more abundant, while GPT only supports keyboard control.

Subjective Evaluation: This significant visual improvement ("shocking," "photorealistic") directly raises users' psychological expectations of the model's capabilities, giving a sense of being "far ahead" intuitively.

Generate an image of a CEO of an American tech company dining at a round table, arguing about whose head the fish head is pointing at.

GPT generated

gemini生成

Gemini generated

2. "More human-like" communication and writing experience (humanity and depth)

The huge differences in personality and writing style between the two, Gemini appears to have more "soul":

Writing ability unmatched: Gemini is trained in academic and professional writing, generating text that is professional, precise, and naturally expresses formulas and symbols, requiring almost no fine-tuning for use. GPT lacks this sense of polish.

Rejects the "hollow person": When discussing deep topics like philosophy and humanities, GPT acts like a "hollow person" or greasy customer service, only providing generic "minimum viable lists," with empathy regressing. Gemini, however, can offer stunning insights, giving a sense of profound knowledge and surprise like "How does this guy even know this?"

Emotional resonance: GPT is described as a "pervertedly skilled workhorse," while Gemini is more like an insightful conversational partner.

3. Composure in handling "dirty and tedious tasks" and special formats (attention to detail)

Although GPT is strong in standard code logic, in some specific scenarios where this is tricky, Gemini performs better:

Document organization: Without enabling slow thinking mode, GPT has poor accuracy or hallucinations when organizing documents. Gemini performs better when organizing documents (unless dealing with very long lists).

LaTeX代码

Tricky format processing: In tedious format adjustments such as LaTeX code writing, table conversion, and double-column to single-column conversion, Gemini can handle it effortlessly, while GPT may not even perform well even when in thinking mode, and it's slow.

4. "Native" multimodal and ultra-long context 带来的便利（省心）

The data and comparisons in Article Three reveal Gemini's natural architectural advantages, reducing the burden on users:

No need for segmentation: The context window with 1 million tokens (approximately 700,000 Chinese characters) is 2.5 times that of GPT. Users can throw in an entire book or a very long video at once for analysis, without having to laboriously segment and feed it to GPT like before.

MMMU-Pro

Native multimodal understanding: Google's CEO called it "the strongest in understanding ability," and test data supports this (MMMU-Pro 81% vs 72-75%). When it comes to understanding complex video and image content, Gemini is more accurate and has fewer hallucinations.

5. Cost-effectiveness and affinity for ecosystem integration (threshold and convenience)

Low price threshold: Gemini AI Plus starts at just $5/month, compared to GPT's $20/month, making it extremely friendly for students and users with limited budgets.

Seamless Ecosystem Integration: For users who deeply utilize the Google suite (Drive, Docs, Gmail), Gemini is directly embedded and integrated, and this system-level convenience enhances overall favorability.

Summary

Subjectively, Gemini feels better because it transcends the category of a "tool person."

GPT-5.1 gives the impression of an extremely efficient but cold and greasy "super employee" (strong in business, poor in aesthetics, formal in speech); while Gemini 3.0 gives the impression of an aesthetically pleasing, in-depth, professional writing-capable "partner" who can handle complex materials. For users seeking creativity, visual quality, and deep communication, the experience provided by Gemini is more "human-like" and full of surprises.